The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-free logo being used in Sirius XM Love. This appears to be a former logo of the organization which has been superseded by File:Sirius XM Love logo.svg. The non-free use rationale provided states the file is being used in the infobox at the top of the article which is not the case at all so WP:NFCC#10c is not satisfied. Tweaking the rationale is not really an option because the former logo is not itself the subject of any sourced sourced discussion within the article so the contextual significance required by WP:NFCC#8 is not evident. Moreover, there's not really much difference between the two logos other than the additional text "XM" in the more recent version, so both are serving essentially the same encyclopedic purpose according to WP:NFCC#3a, which means only one of the two is needed. Finally, since no sourcing information is provided for the file other than the boilerplate text added by the template when the uploader fails to add specific source information, it's currently hard to verify that both WP:NFCC#4 and WP:NFCC#10a are being satisfied. Suggest Remove from the article unless the above NFCC issues are appropriately resolved. Marchjuly (talk) 05:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. — ξxplicit 01:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Various non-free screenshots of newscast opens being used in the "News operation" or "Newscasts" subsections of TV station articles. None of these images are being used in the main infobox as the primary means of identification of the TV station in question and none of the screenshots themselves are the subject of any of sourced commentary within the subsection where they are being used so the contextual significance required by WP:NFCC#8 is not provided. In addition, many of these simply show the same logo being used in the main infobox, so no new encyclopedic information is gained from seeing them per WP:NFCC#3a. Suggest Remove for all files from their articles, unless the non-free content issues can be resolved or if by chance some of these are too simple to be considered copyrightable. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Non-free cover art being used in Spike Milligan#Books. File has a non-free use rationale, but the "Books" section is essentially an embedded list of books written by Milligan, with no critical discussion at all. Generally, non-free files are not allowed for single entries of such lists per WP:NFLISTS because such usage is considered decorative and using the cover art for a book in an article about its author is generally considered to only be acceptable and provide the contextual significance required by WP:NFCC#8 when the cover art itself is either used in the main infobox of a stand-alone article about the book, or is the subject of sourced commentary within the subsection of another article (see WP:NFC#cite note-2 for reference). Suggest remove from "Spike Milligan" unless the NFCC#8 problems are sufficiently resolved. Marchjuly (talk) 07:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Coderzombie (talk) 09:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 March 18#File:Zimmber logo.png. Steel1943 (talk) 17:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Is this logo (just coloured letters) really copyrightable? I am not sure myself, does the overlap between letters count as "original"? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: convert to ((PD-logo)). — ξxplicit 01:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
This seems more like a case for PD-textlogo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Scouting and Guiding in India. This is the logo of an organisation, but the article is not an article about an organisation. The organisation's logo should only be used in the article about the organisation, not in other articles. Stefan2 (talk) 15:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Scouting and Guiding in Ivory Coast. This is the logo of an organisation, but the article is not an article about an organisation. The organisation's logo should only be used in the article about the organisation, not in other articles. Stefan2 (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Archived versions of the image subject's (copyrighted) personal website indicate that the image was published by him at worst within days of being uploaded here. Eg: here and here. There are no earlier archived versions of the site.
I realise that the subject may perhaps have grabbed it from Wikipedia without attribution but I'm a little suspicious because of the sheer number of uploads we see for Indian subjects where the claim of "own work" is proven to be incorrect.
I'm not around much at the moment. If I have nominated this in wrong place then feel free to fix my mistake. Sitush (talk) 16:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Unused, unidentified subject, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:41, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: remove all from laugh track; keep File:Fozzierowlf.jpg in The Muppet Show, remove all other instances. — ξxplicit 01:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
All of these files blatantly fail WP:NFCC#8 in Laugh track. The one file that is not as clearly a WP:NFCC#8 violation as the others, File:Cdouglass LT.jpg, fails WP:NFCC#8 since there is not critical discussion present which requires or is enforced by an image of the device's "inventor"; this file is already present in its respective biographical article. (Technically, these files also fail WP:NFCC#10c, but these files have been restored on Laugh track several times now, so a consensus-enforced decision seems necessary.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)