The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Photo of non-notable subject. Article was deleted at AFD. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Photo of possibly copyrighted 2D works Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Photo of possibly copyrighted 2D works Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:34, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
per c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dooscoop32 Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Photos from ITTF are likely not under a free license as claimed. See c:Commons:Deletion requests/Photos from ITTF. Kelly hi! 09:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
Equivalent at Commons was retained after a DR. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned with no clear use for file on project. Jon Kolbert (talk) 10:40, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete: no info on first publication czar 03:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright statement in metadata is not necessarily compatible with Creative Commons license given. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
See related discussion here. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
The photo itself was printed/created in 1890 but there isn't a clear date of publication. The photo seems to have originated at the online Oregon encyclopedia, run by Portland State University and the Oregon Historical Society. Perhaps they might have more information - their contact form is at: https://oregonencyclopedia.org/contact/ . Shearonink (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)