The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. This was unused when I nominated it, which is no longer the case. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kajit Paron. jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kajit paron (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Orphan, unencyclopedic - unused personal photo Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:32, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Per Wikipedia:User pages it is perfectly acceptable for a user to put their own picture on their talk page and this is what it is used for (at the time of nomination someone else had blanked the page; it has now been restored). — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardOSmith (talk • contribs) 2015-10-23T05:52:50
• Yep, Keep. Typical userpage self-portrait, even Bishzilla has one of those. Bishonen | talk 09:07, 23 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castle Master for Commodore 64 screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by McLoaf (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fair use image used in a gallery without commentary in the Castle Master article. No conceivable use.

File:Castle master-cga.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by McLoaf (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log) Serpinium (talk) 06:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep both. Per the fair use rationales, they are being used to illustrate a game in the article about that game. They exist in addition to the third picture in the gallery not nominated to illustrate the differences and similarities of the same game on different platforms. RichardOSmith (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't see any differences besides the obvious ones for graphical detail and color, which you get in every game and are not especially worth commenting on. It might have been interesting to comment on how the Freescape engine adapts to the different platforms, but that doesn't appear in the article. Serpinium (talk) 09:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajini Idhu Eppadi Irukku dialogue.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thamizhan1994 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Extremely poor quality image, and the dialogue spoken by the character ("Idhu Eppadi Irukku?") in the image occurs multiple times in the film, not just this one moment. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 November 1#File:Philadelphia-Baltimore Stars helmet 1983-1985.png. — ξ^xplicit 06:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philadelphia-Baltimore Stars helmet 1983-1985.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NostalgiaBuff97501 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The FUR claims that this is a logo, but it looks more like a helmet. Fails WP:NFCC#10c for incorrect FUR and additionally fails WP:FREER. Stefan2 (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's a helmet, but it's what's called a "helmet logo", much like used for the Cleveland Browns and a couple of more USFL teams, the Oakland Invaders and the Los Angeles Express. So it belongs on the page... NostalgiaBuff97501 (talk) 06:56, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then why are there plenty of other pictures of helmets containing the same logo in your uploads, such as File:Ohio Glory helmet 1992.png and File:Montreal Machine helmet 1991-1992.png? This implies that you are not uploading a logo which consists of a helmet but an unfree picture of a helmet which contains a logo. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trainline logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cloudbound (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Superceded by File:Trainline.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.