The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Infographic that portrays one particular view of the history of Jews and Samaritans. This picture is to a large part text, none of it sourced, some of it controversial, several parts of it misspelled, and obviously much harder to edit than plain text (more so since it's a PNG).
I don't think this file serves any purpose on Wikipedia. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#3a: former logo. Stefan2 (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Per WP:NFCC#3a: redundant extra logo. Stefan2 (talk) 14:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Deleted one image. --B (talk) 00:50, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Violation of WP:NFCC#3a: the article should only contain one cover.
OK - have removed the image of Knowledge binder leaving only the one image of the Issue 1 cover. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taskerdunham (talk • contribs) 12:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Deleted all of them. If an editor wants an image in this article then one could be restored with a correctly thought out rationale - Peripitus (Talk) 03:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
This article violates WP:NFCC#3a. It should be enough to keep one or two of these. Also, some of the artworks have a fair use rationale containing this text: For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work.
The text is obviously wrong: the object of the article is not an artwork, and the article isn't specifically dedicated as a whole to a discussion of a work. The files which have fair use rationales containing that text currently violate WP:NFCC#10c: invalid fair use rationale. Also, the use of non-free pictures to illustrate living people, such as the subject of the article, violates WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 10:31, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Unused logo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Deleted. Image fails NFCC#8, 3a and (if I read the rationale correctly) 1. The rationale stated that the image's purpose was to show she was on the cover, something that text alone is usually deemed adequate for. - Peripitus (Talk) 03:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Violation of WP:NFCC#3a: we don't need two examples of her modelling career. Stefan2 (talk) 21:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:FREER. Stefan2 (talk) 21:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 03:27, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#3a: two many examples of artworks. One or two should be enough.
Violation of WP:NFCC#10c: invalid fair use rationales. Three of them say For visual identification of the object of the article. The article as a whole is dedicated specifically to a discussion of this work.
but the subject of the articles is not an object and the article isn't specifically dedicated as a whole to a discussion of a work. It's an article about a person, not about an object or a work. One of the FURs says to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question.
but that picture is used at the bottom of the article so that FUR is obviously also blatantly wrong. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Superceded by File:Simple Skincare logo.png. Cloudbound (talk) 21:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Deleted - Peripitus (Talk) 03:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
This is a violation of WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFG. One artwork should be enough, and we already have File:Tampa-Bay-aerial-map.png with an OTRS ticket on Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:39, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in the article indicated in the FUR and also seems to violate WP:NFCC#8 in the article in which the image is violating WP:NFCC#10c. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 22:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:56, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 23:25, 21 March 2015 (UTC)