The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diagram of Exeter St Davids.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mistoop (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-encyclopedic user created image in ms paint CutOffTies (talk) 01:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Can I have some clarification as to why it is non-encyclopedic? Although it focuses mostly on teh facilities rather than the track layouts, it is accurate and gives the user helpful information. Mistoop (talk)
• Delete The same information is available (in a somewhat better diagram) by going to Exeter St Davids railway station and following the station information link in the infobox, and in that, open the "Station Map" section, which yields a diagram similar to the one in question, accompanied by a link to this larger interactive version. If the facilities at Exeter St Davids change, it is not our responsibility to update that map, but it would be our responsibility to update File:Diagram of Exeter St Davids.png - and it should not be, for the same reason that we do not provide an online timetable service. If we have such a map for one station, it's only fair that we should do the same for all - but there are something like 2,500 stations in the UK that are on the National Rail network, we cannot hope to hold accurate up-to-date travel information for all of them, nor should we attempt to do so. We're already struggling to keep up to date the information on which stations are adjacent. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:THE BOWERY 1933.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thomp (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The screenshot is used in the production section of The Bowery (film) and up until a couple of weeks ago was used in the production background section of the article. There is no critical commentary of the image itself in either of the sections, it does nothing to increase the reader's understanding of the film and its exclusion is not detrimental to the understanding of the film, thereby failing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 06:54, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graphical Vespa.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Show-reality (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploaded for article deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prathik Jain. Uploader's other uploads are mostly copyvios. Uploader is now blocked as a sock. B (talk) 12:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Developed 36 Website.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Show-reality (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Uploaded for article deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prathik Jain. Uploader's other uploads are mostly copyvios. Uploader is now blocked as a sock. B (talk) 12:31, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.