The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Used under a fair use claim to show the three presenters of the 14th UK series of Big Brother. However, all three subjects are living people and this could therefore be replaced by up to three free images, failing WP:NFCC#1 "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." –anemoneprojectors– 10:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete as uploader's description states this is "just a test" and the file is orphaned. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is unclear what this is and why Wikipedia needs a long textual document in Hebrew. Stefan2 (talk) 13:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic and low quality because of misspellings. The pictured tengwar text which supposedly reads "Sauron" contains various spelling errors. This very name has been spelled by J. R. R. Tolkien, the inventor of the tengwar, with the character Silme, not with Esse nuquerna, and with a different rendering of the AU diphthong (see: Hammond, Wayne G. & Scull, Christina. J.R.R. Tolkien: Artist & Illustrator. London: HarperCollinsPublishers 1995, #185). In the distorted calligramm versions, the characters esse nuquerna, short carrier and three dots tehta are not recognizable any more. --mach 🙈🙉🙊 17:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, no useful description of what/where this is or why it may ever be useful. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic use. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned; no indication of subject/importance/encyclopedic use. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:51, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned; no indication of subject/usefulness. (ESkog)(Talk) 22:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, not clearly useful (ESkog)(Talk) 22:52, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]