< May 10	May 12 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. Is allegedly "art" but is really gum on a not well maintained vehicle -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:58, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. Is allegedly "art" but is really gum on a not well maintained vehicle -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 03:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

heavily edited orphan image of no encyclopedic value. Was attached to deleted article for The Hood Gallery. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 04:00, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free icon is too high resolution, so it is violating WP:NFCC#3. An icon with proper resolution (File:Microsoft PowerPoint icon.png) is already present in Wikipedia. Codename Lisa (talk) 06:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this a double standard? See File:Microsoft_Word_2013_Icon.png and File:Microsoft_Excel_2013_icon.png which exist in the same resolution, without contest for many months. TinyEdit (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST for the other ones.

Are these icons perhaps below the threshold of originality? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how to answer that. However, the image before was not of the latest 2013 version, that's why I added this new one. I don't think the image I uploaded is too high resolution either, it's 0.65 megapixels. TinyEdit (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The rule is that you should avoid uploading a whole copyrighted work. Here you have uploaded the entire icon at its full resolution, and this is why the resolution has been reduced. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Took care of the resolution of the other two icons. Anything else? Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do believe that the picture in question is a duplicate of this picture. TechFilmer - Feel free to drop a message. 13:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't look like it passes the threshold of originality by any stretch. --B (talk) 11:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The U.S. copyright office has certified copyright protection for logos with a similar level of creativity. The existing, smaller icon image (or a scaled-down version of this one) should be sufficient for any encyclopedic purpose. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is replaceable by a different photo of the same equipment. Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Free replacement: [1]. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. No file exists by this name, but a local image description page does exist. If you are trying to nominate this description page for deletion, use ((db-imagepage)) if possible; if that is not possible, list it at WP:MFD. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. According to our policy, WP:NFCC#3, two non-free file should not be uploaded to Wikipedia when one is enough. In this case, I think this file is redundant because File:Winzip-17-pro-screenshot.png already serves its purpose. This file shows its subject on Windows 8, but I say so what? The only difference between the two is a slight change in their chrome. The other file, on the other hand, is in PNG format. (Still if the community wishes, we can delete the other file.) Codename Lisa (talk) 12:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, low quality. We have many better images at Commons:Category:Crotalus horridus. Kelly ^hi! 15:39, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially just a non-free photo of a woman. Doesn't help the understanding of the article. Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 18:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#8. Kelly ^hi! 02:24, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no article, no obvious use foreseeable. Super Mario Man 19:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:22, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image violated WP:NFCC#1. As the Evening Times was established in 1876, it's absolutely sure that there is a cover, that is out of copyright. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:25, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Per Stefan2, the section this image was in gives info about what he did in later life, not how he looked. INeverCry 19:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion about what he looked like when he was old. There is already an image of him when he was younger. See WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image was added to show Walton as he was as an elderly man 40 years after winning his award in a section called 'Later years'. Jack1956 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Per Stefan2, there's a free alternative, and the subject was known for what she did, not specifically how she looked. INeverCry 19:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable by File:Booth-booth-1904.jpg. The article is mostly about her when she's a lot younger than on this photo. See WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the UK Bramwell-Booth came to prominence late in life through her numerous media appearances. The image of her as a 20 year old will mean nothing to readers of the article. She is known for her longevity, and her fame and popularity came very late in life, and the image reflects that fact. Jack1956 (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates the footnote to WP:NFCI §1. The book image is only allowed in an article about the book, not in the article about the author. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - please delete. Jack1956 (talk) 19:44, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFC#UUI §9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - please delete. Jack1956 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#1 as there are free images of him in his article. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image shows Sick in his later years still in excellent physical shape reflecting that section of the article.Jack1956 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If still protected by copyright as claimed, then this violates WP:NFC#UUI §9. Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An important image to show the subject of the article and which has already been freely reproduced elsewhere. It is the first I have heard that its use violates copyright. Jack1956 (talk) 22:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Crop to remove the title portion, so as to show only the head, and use as fairuse, since the person died in 1925. It is no different from scanning a photo from within the book and using fairuse rationale for that. The photo was clearly not created for the book. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 03:45, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

May 11

File:Polkinghorne.hood1.JPG

File:Sticky05.JPG

File:Hood March.jpg

File:Microsoft PowerPoint 2013 icon.png

File:CPT 4200 Cassette Tape Selectric Word Processor.png

File:WinZip pro17 in Windows 8.JPG

File:Crotalus Horridus captivity.JPG

File:Rain 104.jpg

File:Cd artwork for Wickedkick's Kill To Live EP.jpg

File:Eveningtimes.jpg

File:Kevin Walton GC.jpg

File:Catherine Bramwell-Booth.jpg

File:Cbbooth.jpg

File:Julie Alexander Carnival 1959.jpg

File:Max Sick 1934.jpg

File:Lawende.jpg