The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, lower quality than File:1763-cerne-abbas-giant-anonymous.svg :Jay8gInspect-Berate-Know WASH-BRIDGE-WPWA-MFIC 00:54, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:NFCC#8. No evidence that it was made by the British government as currently claimed. Stefan2 (talk) 01:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Free images available of this actor. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:32, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:NFCC#3a. Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep per information provided by uploader. Dianna (talk) 16:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:NFG. Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:NFLISTS. FUR is not for the article in which the image is used. Stefan2 (talk) 13:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't look like a poster as claimed. It looks more like a magazine article. Commons:Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama probably doesn't apply: the copyright holder is presumably not that website. Stefan2 (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unlikely to be own work and/or licensed under ((cc-by-3.0)): small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, mysterious watermark Gunnex (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There appear to be other images showing papal coronation (for example File:Coelestin V.jpg), so this image seems to violate WP:NFCC#1. Stefan2 (talk) 15:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free map showing areas that Ducks Unlimited projects are active in Louisiana. Oddly, it isn't used in Ducks Unlimited where one might be able to argue for it being fair use, but, rather, in North American Wetlands Conservation Act where it is not at all important to the reader's understanding of the topic. B (talk) 22:29, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Secret (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe that a photograph of clearly-identifiable schoolchildren adds any value to Wikipedia. There are rules in UK schools about taking photos of minors and this picture gives me cause for concern. We would be better off without it. Bob Re-born (talk) 22:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]