The result of the discussion was: Keep as modified. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This file is frankly an embarrassment to Wikipedia. The purpose of allowing a limited number of fair use images to exist in an article is to illustrate the subject matter in question, and the only thing being illustrated here is sex appeal and a nice round butt. As the son of a Colon and Rectal surgeon, I can appreciate a being the butt of bad jokes and other such nonsense, but as far as this article is concerned the image currently in use serves no illustrative purpose for the article in question beyond demonstrating the sex appeal does exist in anime series. Baed on WP:NOT, I am therefore moving that the image be deleted on grounds that it is unencyclopedic for the article's subject matter. TomStar81 (Talk) 04:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedia, orphan, and low quality image that serves no purpose on Wikipedia. Cornell2010 (talk) 04:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep, no consensus for deletion – Quadell (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user has an absolutely excessive collection of personal photographs of no encyclopedic use on her user page and her user talk page. WP:NOTMYSPACE. Note: in addition to these, there are another 18 that have been uploaded to Commons, where I will also be requesting their deletion. — Scott • talk 10:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Split nom - Identify which images, if any, have potential copyright issues and delete those. Then maybe we can work on culling more as necessary. If there's a concern about being "arbitrary" in which images are kept, the best solution would be to discuss it with the uploader rather than nominating everything for deletion. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:49, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of a public figure who died TWO DAYS AGO being used under a claim of fair use. (Though it is from a news media source, it looks like it is probably a publicity still so it's not F7able.) If I'm reading Commons:template:PD-SG-film correctly, any film made in Singapore not under the direction of the government of Singapore is public domain. That should mean that even if he weren't a prolific public figure where we could reasonably expect to receive a freely licensed photo were someone in his home country to undertake an effort to find one, we also have a reasonable expectation that if he was filmed by a single person not affiliated with the Singaporian government before 1987, it's public domain. B (talk) 12:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; while it is probable that the original source of this image is PD, we don't have any way to verify that. Given that public domain images can be readily obtained, this nonfree image is clearly replaceable. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of a deceased California supreme court justice being used under a claim of fair use. Works of the state of California are public domain, so if this photo could be demonstrated to be an official work of the state of California (as opposed to a studio photographer), it might actually be public domain. However, if it isn't, http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/2007_Supreme_Court_Booklet_withInserts.pdf has two photos of this same justice and this booklet is unquestionably public domain. B (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Tom harrison (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what understanding this screenshot is meant to give. It is essentially just a non-free photo of the three actors. Seems to violate WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
((Infobox television/colour))
to determine the colour scheme of the infobox. Series name is automatically italicized." A music video is more or less the same thing as a TV series episode, and the image provides absolutely no information about the music video and isn't critically discussed in any way. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:18, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cover art should only be in the article about the product, not in the article about the group. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator without objections. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking a description, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking context, Image does not assert notability of the data it is a chart for. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lo-res Unused image, lacking description, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Image is unused expect in a sandbox, and does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking a description or context, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking image or description, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn without objection. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert the notability of its subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert the notability of its subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert the notability of its subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, image is lacking descrition or context, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn without objection. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, Image does not assert notability. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:21, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn Nthep (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Unused image, lacking description or context, Image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn without objection. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert notability of its subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn without objection. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn without objection. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image, lacking description or context, image does not assert the notability of it's subject. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused promotional photo. Copyright declaration in summary appears to conflict with licensing declaration. Cloudbound (talk) 21:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:10, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused user photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No consensus – Quadell (talk) 11:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded by File:Tabliczka FR A48.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No consensus – Quadell (talk) 11:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded in use by File:Tabliczka FR A41.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No consensus – Quadell (talk) 11:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded in use by File:Tabliczka FR A42.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No consensus – Quadell (talk) 11:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded in use by File:Tabliczka FR A430.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No consensus – Quadell (talk) 11:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded in use by File:Tabliczka FR A404.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: No consensus – Quadell (talk) 11:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. Superceded in use by File:Tabliczka FR A49.svg. Cloudbound (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unused. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 22:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]