The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ridley Scott Prometheus Set.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Elso24 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A non-free image being used to show the director... directing. Entirely replaceable by text, violates point one of WP:NFCC. — ξ^xplicit 00:35, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 00:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Sommer Buchenwald.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 7mike5000 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical individual it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, maybe you should make a wee bit of effort in finding information on a subject instead of coming off like a know-it-all. Here is another place with the same photograph which states it is Martin Sommer; it is from Dr. John M. Steiner, senior scholar-in-residence at Sonoma State University and founding director of the Holocaust Studies Center.[1] Here is another one from the official museum at Buchenwald[2] - that's in Germany in case you didn't know. I believe a college professor and the official state museum at Buchenwald have more credibility than you Mr. Fifelfoo.7mike5000 (talk) 16:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So remove this version sourced from a conspiracy theorist site, and insert a copyright okay version sourced from an appropriate site. There's no reason to believe that any content sourced from "scrapbookpages.com" is in any way legitimate. Unlike the Buchemwald museum, "scrapbookpages.com" has no credibility in the maintenance or correct display of historical photographs. WP:RS applies here, and your personal beliefs do not trump policy. The version displayed at the moment was neither sourced from http://www.buchenwald-videoprojekt.de/ nor from the Special Collections of the Salazar Library of Sonoma State University; but from an open blog run by a historical revisionist. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:09, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I changed the source to http://libweb.sonoma.edu/exhibits/nazi_dictatorship/adventures.html. The scrapbookpages website is completely unreliable, but the Sonoma State professor's site is okay. Binksternet (talk) 19:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Mr. Fifelfoo I'm clueless as to what "my personal beliefs" are supposed to refer to. If actually improving the quality of Wikipedia meant anything to individuals such as yourself you could have taken the TWO minutes to punch Martin Sommer into the search engine; click images; find the picture on the Sonoma State University website and re-uploaded the SAME EXACT PICTURE, as opposed to User:Binksternet who did take the whole two minutes to do so. 7ven Mike5000 Huh? What? Who?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MassGrave03.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Noohgodno (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical event it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Here is he same image at Yad Vashem[3]. Stop being disruptive; either do something constructive or don't do anything at all, because nobody is going to want to play with you anymore. mikelfoo18:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unless I'm missing something, nothing indicates that this image was released under a Creative Commons license. — ξ^xplicit 00:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Source is ((bsr)), so there is no way to verify the licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 08:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Franz, Kurt Hubert 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hoops gza (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopaedic. Per WP:RS/N there is no reason to believe that this file represents the historical individual it claims to represent due to the source from which the file was obtained. Fifelfoo (talk) 01:23, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:CantChange.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nick449 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR, no source, possible album cover? No encyc use. Skier Dude (talk) 02:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Untitled copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nick449 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR 'logo' (text only), no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 02:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment if this is kept, it should be renamed as this is a completely unreasonable name. In any case, this file name should be salted as being totally unhelpful. -- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 02:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greys Trademark a.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Greypossum (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

OR user-logo; no encyc use foreseen Skier Dude (talk) 02:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iphone 4s marry siri.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thechased (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails NFCC 8; you don't need to see the GUI in order to know that it offers humorous responses, and there's already another image of the GUI in the infobox. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:57, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep provides visual identification as well as an example. CyanGardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 08:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NFCC#1: replaceable by text. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snowman1962.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sallyrob (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

A low-quality personal photograph of little encyclopedic use, and of little benefit to Commons. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ^xplicit 00:37, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Star of life parts.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Owain.davies (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

I highly doubt the Star of Life is cc-licensed. Might qualify for fair use or else. I'm not familiar enough with enwiki guidelines to judge on that. abf /talk to me/ 14:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A few of points on this one. First of all, the Rod of Asceplius at the centre is public domain as it is an ancient symbol, and the particular version used is licence free. That just leaves the star bit, and that "consists of simple geometric shapes and/or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain", to quote the template and that means it can be used.

Secondly, the article leads me to believe that the logo trademark expired in 1997, and not renewed, instead 'gifted' to the national register of EMTs in the US, which then allows public use. It is in such widespread public domain use (featuring in multiple licence free clip art collections for instance), and indeed is written in to statute or regulations in various parts of the globe (including in the EU, far from the origins of the mark, where the SoL is mandatory on ambulances in order to comply with CEN regulation), that it would no longer seem to have a bona fide owner, and that it seems unlikely that any claim to ownership of the trademark could now be successful.

Lastly, as the various versions of the Star of Life we have on wiki at the moment state, (like one), it was originally created by an employee of the US government in the course of their duties, and is therefore public domain. Take your pick of reason, but this strongly seems to be public domain! OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 21:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment the File:Star of life2.svg is on commons. -- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 06:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Glantz, as "Osmo the Wizard".jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Merrydef (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Image quality is atrocious. It is impossible to see what's going on. Bazonka (talk) 17:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commonwealth Paraplegic Games Programme Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aussiesportlibrarian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

It is not necessary to host a copy of a programme cover in order to tell that people were doing things in Australia in 1962. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:15, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - When I reviewed the adjacent article for GA I was unsure of this image on exactly these grounds, but the reply to my question Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions/Archive/2012/June#Request_for_aid_on_reviewing_images. was positive (admittedly only one editor replied, but there was no disent).Fayedizard (talk) 21:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Um, did I miss something? Am I raising this as the wrong place? I kind of thinking that there was going to be a discussion...Fayedizard (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The images discussed at WP:MCQ are used in a completely different article, and most of them appear to be free. Non-free images have to be important for the article (see WP:NFCC#8). A logo makes sense in the main article about the competition, but this image is only used in an article about the results, where it adds no information. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VaganovaEntrywayCloseUpMay2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by OperaJoeGreen (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#8. No need for a photo of the sign outside the building. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete agreed, especially in light of the free images available. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:36, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.