The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary temporary file used in place of File:Republican Party presidential primaries results, 2012 (corrected).svg, which the uploader was ostensibly not able to edit because it is an SVG. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:44, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
see my nomination immediately above (File:Republican Party presidential primaries results by county, 2012 (corrected).png); the only difference is that the uploader is assuming Washington County as Ron Paul (although it hasn't reported any results as of this writing). Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto (File:Maine Republican Presidential Caucuses Election Results by County, 2012.svg) Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Invalid FUR--not needed for critical commentary —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that this file actually is available under a CC license. It does not currently appear at the site cited as source, and given the fact that the only image there is explicitely labeled as (c), a CC license for this image seems rather unlikely. Rosenzweig (talk) 12:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Frankenfels Wappen.svg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wappenviehdorf.svg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality, orphaned, File:AUT Staatz COA.jpg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Low quality. Can we replace it with File:AUT Großengersdorf COA.jpg? Same except for the text at the top. Stefan2 (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:AUT Großebersdorf COA.jpg is better (but doesn't have the unnecessary text at the top). Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thumbnail copied from German Wikipedia. Replaced by File:Wappen Heiligenkreuz.svg on German Wikipedia. Do we need the colour effects on the yellow parts, or can we just drop this file? Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Can we drop the unnecessary text at the top and replace it by the higher quality version File:AUT Hausbrunn COA.jpg? Stefan2 (talk) 16:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:AUT Gaubitsch COA.jpg is better but lacks the unnecessary text at the top. Can we delete this file? Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Let's drop the unnecessary text at the top and replace it by File:AUT Altlichtenwarth COA.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Improperly sourced. File:AUT Jennersdorf COA.svg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
File:Coat of arms of Gussing.svg is better. Besides, there is no link to the source on German Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Multiple non-free items are used when one would be sufficient in Robert William St. John and omission of these images would not be utterly detrimental to a reader's understanding of the aforementioned article. FASTILY (TALK) 23:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]