The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:19, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, from my brief research it seems like this is not a notable type of puzzle -> unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:36, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no source, coins are not 2d objects for purposes of 2d=public domain. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
original uploaded file seems to be corrupt, new file has no source Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:52, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, superseded by File:UK-Navy-OFStudent.gif Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Formerly adopted by User:Lordkinbote" is not a source that we can accept. Without a better source than this for this image, we can't use the image, nor can we determine if this logo is PD or not on account of its age. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:18, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 October 17. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence that image is in the public domain. See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:A. Eichmann's Lebenslauf.jpg Sreejith K (talk) 07:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
((OTRS Pending))
to the image description page. The license tag is clearly not correct, as Eichmann's appointment order is not a work of the United States Federal Government. What license tag do you think applies? – Quadell (talk) 13:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]The copy which we see is from the microfilm of Eichmann's record on file at College Park. So, it is not the record itself which we see, but a copy of a microfilm owned by the National Archives. All the SS records at College Park are part of the Captured German Documents collection, and can be freely copied and reproduced with a citation to NARA. I don't know what else to say about this except that I've worked with these records for a very long time and have published several copies of SS records in research papers. Never has there been any issue of copyright infringement and all the papers I've ever written simply attribute the records as "SS records on file with U.S. National Archives, College Park". The e-mail which I was copied on confirmed this, and gave a follow-up address and e-mail for further verification. I hope that should be good enough for this. At this stage, for me personally, it doesn't matter that much anymore since I've made a decision to take a lot of my work off Wikipedia for professional publishing. -OberRanks (talk) 03:38, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable non-free image of a living person, though challenged when tagged. It is clear from the fair use rationale that this is being used strictly to show what the person looks like, and the person's physical appearance at a given point in time is not material to the person's work, as they were a photographer (behind the camera) and not a model or something. Thus this is replaceable with a free image. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:20, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
user has uploaded magazine covers, collages of CDs, and watermarked images as own work. some of these images are watermarked, some look like promo photos. some might be legit. but i think there's enough question about provenance that we should delete all of them (barring further explanation). Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
user has uploaded magazine covers, collages of CDs, and watermarked images as own work. some of these images are watermarked, some look like promo photos. some might be legit. but i think there's enough question about provenance that we should delete all of them (barring further explanation). Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
user has uploaded magazine covers, collages of CDs, and watermarked images as own work. some of these images are watermarked, some look like promo photos. some might be legit. but i think there's enough question about provenance that we should delete all of them (barring further explanation). Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
user has uploaded magazine covers, collages of CDs, and watermarked images as own work. some of these images are watermarked, some look like promo photos. some might be legit. but i think there's enough question about provenance that we should delete all of them (barring further explanation). Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no real source - comment on upload says "metalfinder archives 2010" which suggests uploader did not create it Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned userphoto Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:54, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY (TALK) 07:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i'm skeptical that this was actually taken by the user, whose photos vary widely in quality. web-resolution, no EXIF data. Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
i'm skeptical this was created by the uploader, whose uploads vary widely in quality.[1] Web-resolution, no exif data Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Superior (cropped) version exists at Commons with the same name. – Quadell (talk) 17:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan. Page of text in Hebrew. Uploader claims "image of historical hebrew manuscript", but there's no indication of what manuscript. Uploader also claims to have created the image himself. – Quadell (talk) 17:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Circuit diagram, no meaningful description, dubious license, orphan, probably not useful – Quadell (talk) 17:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, chart without context, unclear how it could be used – Quadell (talk) 17:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, chart without context, unclear how it could be used – Quadell (talk) 17:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, not sure how this could be useful Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
chart without context, all text, orphan, not likely to ever be useful – Quadell (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (seems to be original research) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (seems to be original research) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (seems to be original research) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (seems to be original research) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:51, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, dont' think this is needed any longer Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, don't think this is needed any longer Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, no telling who these people are, unlikely to be useful – Quadell (talk) 17:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
chart of text without context, orphan, no description, not likely to ever be useful – Quadell (talk) 18:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, doesn't look like it needs to be kept Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, source is not sufficient to verify copyright status Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
bad name, orphan, description is a website URL (so is the license valid?) – Quadell (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bad name, orphan, no description, not useful – Quadell (talk) 18:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:06, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, bad name, no description, no telling what/where this is – Quadell (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned PNG derived from File:Flag of New Spain.svg Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
likely copyvio (watermarked) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Random person (bad name, no description, orphan) – Quadell (talk) 18:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Random person (bad name, no description, orphan) – Quadell (talk) 18:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, unencyclopedic, blurry pic of a guy in boxer-briefs – Quadell (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphan, not useful – Quadell (talk) 18:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphan, bad name, no telling who this is, not useful – Quadell (talk) 18:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphan, bad name, not useful – Quadell (talk) 18:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Random person, orphan, bad name, no description – Quadell (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Random person, bad name, no way to identify – Quadell (talk) 18:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Random person, bad name, orphan, no way to identify – Quadell (talk) 18:38, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Some group performing, no telling who. Bad title, no description. – Quadell (talk) 18:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, once used in article, but it was deleted as non-notable – Quadell (talk) 18:45, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, apparently source given is a place. not confident that this is the uploader's own work. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:28, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no source, impossible to verify copyright status (how do we know this was published anonymously?) Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, source insufficient to verify copyright status Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, sourced to random website, no way to verify copyright status Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, source insufficient to verify copyright status, age of car is not necessarily publication date (or even age of photo), no evidence that this was published anonymously as claimed Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Superseded by File:Wheelchair symbol.svg. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:56, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, nonfree (due to WP logo) — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 21:20, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused image does not appear to have any encyclopedia value. Eeekster (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]