The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned File, Unknown Subject, no use to keep Ronhjones (Talk) 00:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user's image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 04:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, subject not ID'd Skier Dude (talk) 04:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user image; no other encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user-made logo; no target article & no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 07:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned user-created logo; lq; no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 07:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OR, LQ, no encyc use Skier Dude (talk) 07:16, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OR, LQ, no encyc use - user's only contribution Skier Dude (talk) 07:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OR, floorplan for unnamed building Skier Dude (talk) 07:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. The video, being simply an excerpt of a CCTV recording with minimal human editing, appears to fail the threshold of originality necessary for copyright in the US. The watermark logo similarly appears to be plain text and a "play" icon, which is clearly PD-textlogo, and is also incidental (although I do agree that if a version can be found without watermarking, that should be uploaded instead). Anomie⚔ 03:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The "non-free historic image" template only applies to images, not videos. Wikipedia's Image use policy only covers image use, in regards to fair use. There is no equivalent policy which permits "fair use" of copyrighted video material, otherwise we would have terabytes of video data that anyone would deem "historically significant" to be hosted on Wikipedia. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 16:34, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no indication on source page (now dead, see archive link) that this image is free-use. uploader is blocked as a sockmaster. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:17, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no source, uploader has contributed copyright violations (see above) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no stated source, doubtful own work because uploader has contributed copyright violations (see above) Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no source, uploader has contributed copyright violations Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, no stated source, unlikely that uploader (who has uploaded copyright violations) personally took this low-res, professional-quality image Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:23, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 18:46, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 19:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
only used on userpage, highly doubt this graphic is self-made, uploader has lied about the source of other images Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
highly doubt that this professional-quality graphic is self-made, user has lied about source of other images Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, possibly non-free derivative work. Kelly hi! 19:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that uploader took this picture because even his high-res snapshotty images have turned out to be copyvios (e.g. File:StCatherineChurchAlexandria.jpg) and he has lied left and right about the soruces for his images Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I highly doubt that uploader (serial copyvio uploader) created this professional-quality graphic from scratch Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:08, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
used only on user talk page, i highly doubt that anything uploaded by Lanternix is own work Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned userphoto. Kelly hi! 19:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lanternix has repeatedly claimed that images (even relatively high-res, snapshotty images) are his own work, and many are confirmed to be blatant copyvios with Lanternix just lying and saying he took them. i think we should delete this to be on the safe side. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lanternix has repeatedly claimed that images (even relatively high-res, snapshotty images) are his own work, and many are confirmed to be blatant copyvios with Lanternix just lying and saying he took them. i think we should delete this to be on the safe side. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unnecessary to have a non-free image to show a funeral when the article is about the massacre and the funeral is incidental; source info given is insufficient to identify copyright holder so we can't do WP:NFCC analysis Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
unnecessary to have a non-free image to show a generic victim being visited in the hospital (does not tell readers anything important about the massacre); source info given is insufficient to identify copyright holder so we can't do WP:NFCC analysis Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, possibly non-free. Kelly hi! 19:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned user image. Kelly hi! 19:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
uploaded by sock of serial copyright violator Lanternix, low res --> likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
photo by contemporary artist marked public domain Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly hi! 19:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned Wikipedia screenshot. Kelly hi! 19:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan, probably non-free derivative work. Kelly hi! 19:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned logo. Kelly hi! 20:03, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unused and orphaned image. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 20:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced, apparent upload for vandalism purposes. Fæ (talk) 22:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]