The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free image: We don't need to see an image of a guy receiving a certificate of honour to understand that the guy received the certificate of honour. Damiens.rf 03:13, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free headshot of a character. Damiens.rf 03:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not used. Not useful. Damiens.rf 03:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I want to stress that this nom is not about the images themselves but rather the fact they are all uploaded by a publicist for the label *and* they all contain the labels logo. As such they come off a bit spammy. As an option: they are all free of copyright they can all be re-purposed if anyone wanted to take the time to do that. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:19, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:12, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nomination on behalf of Crusoe8181 (talk · contribs), who prodded this file with the rationale "a ridiculous and offensive parody which is not used in any articles". Since files cannot be prodded I am bringing it here.
For my part, I am neutral. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Author admits that image was a copyrighted image that isn't his own. G7 declined for no particular reason. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free TV episode screenshot. Shows a stunt scene in which a character is ejected through her car's windscreen in a car accident. FUR correctly explains how that event is a key element in the plot. But the image is not needed to understand the element. Nothing in the visual detail of the event, rather than the sheer fact of the event, is crucial to understanding the article. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
orphaned, banned uploader. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File was deleted on Commons (Commons:Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jawad.jpg) and uploader has been blocked on enwiki. So perhaps we should delete here too. MGA73 (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]