The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:BANDLOGO —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fake PNG version: It is same as File:Windows Product Activation dialog.jpg, only five times larger. Has the same low quality. Fleet Command (talk) 08:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned user image who has been inactive since 2007 and only edit was to upload this photo. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned image of inactive user. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned image of inactive user Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned image of inactive user. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:15, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned image of inactive user. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:17, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Substantially similar to the original cover already in the article, so the remastered cover is unnecessary. No critical commentary on the cover is given in the article. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Substantially similar to the original cover already in the article, so the remastered cover is unnecessary. No critical commentary on the cover is given in the article. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Substantially similar to the original cover already in the article, so the remastered cover is unnecessary. No critical commentary on the cover is given in the article. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned image of inactive user since 2007. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 17:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Substantially similar to the original cover already in the article, so the remastered cover is unnecessary. No critical commentary on the cover is given in the article. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Substantially similar to the original cover already in the article, so the remastered cover is unnecessary. No critical commentary on the cover is given in the article. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free advertisement image used solely for illustration, not at all necessary to understanding of the topic. Kelly hi! 18:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free advertisement image used solely for illustration, not at all necessary to understanding of the topic. Kelly hi! 18:55, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, obsoleted by vastly superior SVG version, no need to retain for attribution since the logo is PD. –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic image of two unidentified people. –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:25, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, low quality personal image. Unencyclopedic. –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, low quality image of an unidentified person. Unencyclopedic. –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to low quality Acather96 (talk) 20:19, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Un-used PDF in a foreign language, no description provided. Possibly not the work of the uploader. Acather96 (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to low quality and lack of description. Acather96 (talk) 20:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Someone's fingers - orphaned and unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to lack of description. Acather96 (talk) 20:25, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free image used solely for illustration, not at all necessary to understanding of the topic. Sir Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 20:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A screenshot of the person on television, with a ticker below him. Fails NFCC#8, and comes close to failing NFCC#1, since this is just a portrait with a glorified border. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, unencyclopedic due to low quality. Acather96 (talk) 20:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of rights release. Source website says "All Rights Reserved". damiens.rf 20:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, use the Happy Valley pictures, I have no problem. I’m assuming I’ll be mentioned in the photo credit.
Sounds like you have some Wikipedia experience. Can you do me a favor? Check out the page on the rcdb:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RCDB
It has that note about notability at the top and talk about the page being delete. Anything you can do to correct the page so that note goes away?
Duane
From: Bryce Wilson [1] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 11:06 PM To: Duane Marden Subject: Permission to use RCDB photos
Hello,
I would like to use some of Duane Marden’s photos for articles about the Happy Valley park in Shanghai, China on Wikipedia. These include one (1) photo of each roller coaster. Since I think using your photos without your permission is stealing, do I have your permission to upload your photos to Wikipedia?
Sincerely, Bryce W. (Bryce53 on Wikipedia)
Bryce Wilson | talk 23:39, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded as a temporary file for an FPC candidate 5 years ago - orphaned and unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 21:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded as a temporary file for an FPC candidate 5 years ago - orphaned and unencyclopedic Acather96 (talk) 21:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned to File:Map athenian empire 431 BC-en.svg, which is laid out slightly better. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, low quality, source of "Wikipedia existing photo" is not really acceptable. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:25, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source is this paper which is a copyright of MetaCASE. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:35, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned and outdated. Would go at Linux Mint if it were current, but as I said, it isn't current. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned logo. Possibly unfree (in which case, delete as violating WP:NFCC's minimum-use requirement), if it is free, it isn't being used anyway and should probably be an SVG. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]