The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The same image uploaded by the same user [[1]]. They have uploaded this same image a total of three times. Fixer23 (talk) 03:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopaedic. Uploaded as test, used as part of test edit or vandalism Mildly MadTC 13:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This non-free image copied from a news source shows an important man in an important day of his life, although seeing this image is not necessary for understanding the discussion about that important event. Damiens.rf 17:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free image shows two men working. Damiens.rf 17:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Publicity-type images are generally not copyrighted by studios. In any case, it's use in the section about the film makes it relevant, descriptive of the commentary, and more than a mere decoration.--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 21:52, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There are free images of Goldie Hawn. Damiens.rf 17:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative repetitive non-free image. Damiens.rf 17:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The image directly relates to much of the commentary within the article, not just about this particular play image, but his style of acting, stage settings, and his attire. The contextual linkage of the image and article is definite.--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 05:04, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep Skier Dude (talk) 01:30, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free headshot of actor. Damiens.rf 17:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unecessary non-free magazine cover being used just because the cover is mentioned. Damiens.rf 17:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The cover image has significant contextual value as it show him in illustrated in many of the leading roles as a recognized character actor. It's not the magazine alone that adds value, but the various images within it. This kind of illustration adds significantly to a reader's understanding of the article.--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative dvd cover. Damiens.rf 17:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative dvd cover. Damiens.rf 17:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Deleted by User:Peripitus exposing a file on Commons of the same name. —teb728 t c 23:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary non-free image copied from Associated Press. It shows an important woman in an important day on her life, but we don't need to see this photo to understand the discussion about those important events. Damiens.rf 19:12, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image not found on source. Copyright holder unknown. Damiens.rf 19:19, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 18:09, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-free image of a living guy. Damiens.rf 20:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I selected the specific mage from the newspaper article "Belleville had its share of fame: Nice guy Clint Walker became Hollywood hunk" by By Jaime Ingle that appeared in News-Democrat on June 18, 2008. I did due diligence on this matter, and this is reflected in the Purpose of use and Replaceable in the Summary section for this image. The picture was originally created more than 50 years ago and was, at the time, of its creation, distributed freely for publicity purposes. It is assumed to be in the public domain and is being used here in good faith for information only and that, after so many years, it will not have any negative impact on its creators or on Mr. Walker himself. Publicity Photos (star headshots) older publicity stills have usually not been copyrighted and since they have been disseminated to the public, they are generally considered public domain and therefore there is no necessity to clear them with the studio that produced them per the guidance at the Creative Guidance web site. Marcd30319 (talk) 23:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And yet it didn't make a bit of difference.Marcd30319 (talk) 21:30, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep. Wikipedia isn't a ballot, but when four of five statements are good-faith "keep", it's obvious what way the discussion is going. Nyttend (talk) 01:43, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Decorative non-free image showing three man working. Damiens.rf 20:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 22:53, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Claims "public domain","Out of copyright", "Fair use", "ineligible for copyright" all in a short space of time. Template:PD-UK shows it needs to be 70 years old to be out of copyright, so I suspect it's not. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete - Markd30319, I would also direct you to read item#8 on Wikipedia:NFC#Images_2. We have a specific bar to pass for images used in this context that your argument is not addressing - Peripitus (Talk) 22:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: there is no commentary about this post 1978 US stamp itself other than is was issued and what it shows which is described in prose, but this is not sufficient to pass WP:NFCC#8 for non-free stamp images being used in non-stamp articles. ww2censor (talk) 21:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It make no sense to talk about a something and not show it. The image and prose complement each other. We are not serving the best interest of the reader of the article by deleting this image. Is that not the primary objective of Wikipedia? Marcd30319 (talk) 11:23, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Structure is sooo wrong! Ronhjones (Talk) 21:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is Methylisothiocyanate, to show the group one should have an "R" at the end of the bond to the "N". Orphan file anyway. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan file. This is methyl isocyanate, needs an "R" Ronhjones (Talk) 21:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan file, photo of 3D artwork, may or may not be copyvio Ronhjones (Talk) 22:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan file, Photo of 3D artwork Ronhjones (Talk) 22:20, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan File, Photo of 3D artwork Ronhjones (Talk) 22:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]