The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABCD0001.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Deewmirage (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused personal image. When this was uploaded it overwrote this image.- a small blurry photo of a pin, so there may not be any use for that either. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABCD0003.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Eugen Simion 14 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused image with no source listed and no description. A teacher with students? Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; the uploader removed it from his own userpage more than a year ago (before it was overwritten with the current image), so it's not been in any valid use. We shouldn't have any qualms about deleting images of users tha are uploaded with the sole purpose of illustrating users if they've not been used for that purpose in a long time. Nyttend (talk) 23:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paul Palumbo and Jessi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Paul Palumbo (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Unused personal photo. (File:76545357995743.jpg redirects to this). One of the subject is the uploader. Most likely sent to the uploader by the photographer making this an unfree file as someone other than the uploader has taken the photo. NOTE: This file was already sent to PuI but it was declined by an admin who felt it may be a "work for hire" or "used with permission" and it should be sent it IfD instead. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I declined the PUF because I thought that it is a free file. I recommended FFD, but only meant to do so if the nominator thought the image should be deleted regardless because it's unused and useless. As such, I informed the nominator I think this is the wrong venue and that (s)he should take it to deletion review. I admit I am not perfect, but I believe my interpretation of policy is correct in this instance. Relevant discussion is on my talk page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd be willing to delete this on the basis that, lapsing into hated jargon, it is UE and OR, but not for the reasons given by the nominator. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Actually I don't hate the original research concept and have wondered why it is not really considered a valid argument when it comes to certain user created maps or graphs or manipulated images. And when you say "UE", I am guessing you mean "Use English"? Not sure how that applies to the name of this image. Soundvisions1 (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  He means unencyclopedic. And for the record I still think this discussion should be at DRV if we are judging by the merits of the freeness of the file alone. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete just a snapshot uploaded for the users own page which is currently orphaned, if it is free and the user wants to use it again it can be uploaded at commons. MilborneOne (talk) 17:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC) This is not an image from the 1972 Charlton Heston movie, but from the 1974 Royal Shakespeare Company television production of the same name. Delete or redesignate. 96.241.16.199 (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe ((Rename media)) is the proper process.. œ^™ 23:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. File is now also orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:21, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.