The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BBC One logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sick 3 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• It has low resolution. There is a image that has better quality. That is the one to replace this file. 121.1.55.87 (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: unnecessary unused non-free image when File:BBC One logo.svg exists with free ((PD-textlogo)) licence. ww2censor (talk) 14:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:StrangeTooBack.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by NikJam (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Invalid FUR--album cover, not book--and unnecessary for understanding the topic. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cigarette holder.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Cradel (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, no foreseeable use, obsoleted by png version at File:Cigarette holder.png. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:10, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was:  Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 June 6. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamp-autumn.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by PSYC4805 (notify | contribs | uploads).

• • Delete: Non-free 1971 postage stamp being used to illustrate the fact the images by the subject of the article illustrated stamps is used in a non postage stamp article fails WP:NFC#Images #3. It also fails WP:NFCC#8 because the stamp's existence and its purpose are perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image and the lack of a non-free image is not detrimental to the reader's understanding of the facts. ww2censor (talk) 14:50, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: This postage stamp image is being used to identify (not merely 'illustrate') the particular stamp. The image's presence, in my view, whilst not necessary, significantly increases readers' understanding of the topic of the section (Alma_Duncan#Canada_Post) and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. It is the only image in that section. According to the article the stamp has been awarded a stamp of the month ("Stamp of the Month." Scott Monthly Journal 52 (19 Sept. 1971): 3.) which would seem to meet the desired critical commentary . So it seems to me it passes WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 09:24, 1 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamp of Dr. Fazle Rabbee.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dinosrawr (notify | contribs | uploads).

• • Delete: Non-free postage stamp being used to illustrate the fact the subject was illustrated on a stamp fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. The stamp's existence and its purpose could be perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image. ww2censor (talk) 15:17, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stamp norway Niels Henrik Abel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zanimum (notify | contribs | uploads).

• • Delete: Non-free 2002 postage stamp being used to illustrate the fact the subject was illustrated on a stamp fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. The stamp's existence and its purpose are perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image. ww2censor (talk) 15:18, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TG4 10 year stamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by IrishTV (notify | contribs | uploads).

• • Delete: Non-free postage stamp being used to illustrate the fact the subject was illustrated on a stamp fails WP:NFC#Images #3 and WP:NFCC#8. The stamp's existence and its purpose cold be perfectly well explained in prose without the necessity of using a non-free image. ww2censor (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Song for You.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by The Obento Musubi (notify | contribs | uploads).

• Orphaned, serves no purpose. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.