< January 15 | January 17 > |
---|
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete per CSD:I7, but please read the entire listing for context. Stifle (talk) 11:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is quite a strange one, so bear with me. This image of James McLean was uploaded back in 2006 by MadMax, who hasn't edited since May 2007. It's gone through several different licenses and fair use rationales. Currently it is tagged as a mugshot, although it does not look very like one to me. It was listed on PUI back in November last year, but was delisted since fair use images are out of scope there.
Most recently, we received an OTRS complaint (OTRS agents can view this at Ticket:2009011510014644) that the image was in fact copied and cropped from a website [1] (second image on that page), that it is not a mugshot, and that its use in James McLean is not fair use as it is not used for illustration of or critical commentary on the book in question.
In either case, the image is copyrighted and non-free, so that is not in question. Up for discussion here:
If the answer to #3 is in the negative, then the image must be deleted. The image at [3] may help shape your opinion.
I have not formed an opinion on the matter yet, but am listing here due to the OTRS complaint. Stifle (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: The result was delete. The consensus was that NFCC #8 applies here. The lone event the image depicts wouldn't require a fair use image to display under that, as per especially pd_THOR, Sandstein, and Peripitus's reasoning. rootology (C)(T) 20:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Keep
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:10, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]