Support as nominator – MER-C 10:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Bloated (8,000 words) first target article seems highly promotional and is orange-tagged re sourcing. – Sca (talk) 12:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Article quality is quite rightfully not in the featured picture criteria, but I agree that the article needs work. Image is excellent and easily meets the criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been rewritten down to 3,300 words. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Still orange-tagged re sources. And 3,300 words isn't what one might call succinct. -- Sca (talk) 12:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Short of having an Estonian speaker, I don't see referencing reaching a point where the orange tag can be safely removed. As for the length, 3,300 words is about par for 150 years of history, especially for a company that has been deemed culturally and historically significant (for comparison, the current TFA is 7,700 words). The POTD Coordinator will certainly have to be careful with the blurb down the line, assuming this passes. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]