Photograph I took, I think that it is a nicely composed picture juxtaposing the city against nature. - Pdefer | !! 03:19, 2005 Mar 2 (UTC)

Self-Nom and support - Pdefer | !! 03:19, 2005 Mar 2 (UTC)
Neutral. Would benefit from some smoothing in the sky, and perhaps a crop. —Korath (Talk) 03:34, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose the edited version. The crop is good, and I agree with the bits that have been cloned away, but the graininess in the sky is, if anything, worse, and it's now oversaturated. —Korath (Talk) 04:56, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Good shot -- Chris 73 Talk 04:24, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
Comment: added alternative version. Fredrik | talk 15:55, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - the cropped version is definitely a better composition, I feel, but it looks to me like a scan from a print, at rather low resolution. The sky is very mottled (perhaps the JPEG is too compressed?), and sharpness is generally lacking. Worldtraveller 16:01, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. A nice snapshot, but not particularly outstanding. Denni ☯ 03:23, 2005 Mar 3 (UTC)
Oppose. Fully agree with Worldtraveller. --Fir0002 06:05, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Not particularly striking. Grainy buildings and sky are highly distracting.--Deglr6328 05:17, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Not promoted +2/-5/1 Broken Segue 14:34, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)