Reason

It is of high technical standard,high resolution,and Avoids inappropriate digital manipulation.

Articles this image appears in

Rose

Creator

Sasukekun22

• Support as nominator --Sasukekun22 (talk) 07:38, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Two questions: (1) what species is this? and (2) can you reupload the picture with a more descriptive filename? MER-C 09:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose When view full, the dark rose at from seems out of focus and somewhat grainy. Also, I don't like the blurry white flowers in the front by the right of the image. Spencer^T♦C 01:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Spencer. —αἰτίας •discussion• 23:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per above and no cultivar information, just 'red rose' is unacceptable for an encyclopedia Thisglad (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted . --John254 18:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]