Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2013 at 16:46:03 (UTC)

Reason: Technically, this shouldn't have problems; it's featured at Commons. It has extremely high EV for tract housing: nothing's better for illustrating tract housing than a low-altitude aerial shot of such a "neighborhood".
Articles in which this image appears: Tract housing, Suburb, plus a non-encyclopedic (but still useful) appearance at WP:ROTM.
FP category for this image: Places
Creator: IDuke

Support as nominator --Nyttend (talk) 16:46, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support -- highlights are blown, but the dynamic range of the scene seems impossible to capture in one photo. The resolution is a bit too low to get my full support. EV is fine. Overall it is a pretty interesting picture. Maybe consider putting it in the article for Markham, Ontario too? It seems somewhat relevant to the section on city issues, urban growth, urban sprawl etc. in Markham. dllu (t,c) 23:52, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tomer T (talk) 12:51, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The repeating pattern creates a lot of "wow" and EV. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all above. Real great. Mediran (t • c) 12:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-done, and I'll accept some blown highlights and size issues in a hard-to-replace aerial shot. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 17:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support They did this to my home-state too. (Though I'm supporting for image EV than because I can relate to it.) – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 21:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Markham-suburbs aerial-edit2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]