Nominate and SupportTomStar81 (Talk) 05:38, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's just not a very interesting or beautiful image. --frothTC 06:02, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not remarkable among aircraft photos (which are nearly universally attractive), and this one is at the absolute bare minimum resolution, which doesn't help. SnurksTC 08:45, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree that it's a little boring, but it's enc. as well. | AndonicOTalk | Sign Here 20:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not the best of wikipedia. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 21:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support It would be too boring for me, though the way the exhaust distorts the background is oddly beautiful. Beyond that, it is relatively significant. --Lewk_of_Serthiccontribtalk 01:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't vote support per nom if you don't even know what it means --frothTC 07:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, not impressive enough. FPs are supposed to be the best that WP has to offer. - Mailer Diablo 11:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. In complete vacuum, this image would probably make it, but it's fairly average when compared with the other free photographs of aircraft that are out there. GeeJo(t)⁄(c) • 23:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting picture. That's all there is to it! BookswormTalk to me! 18:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not promoted Raven4x4x 02:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]