Support as nominator – — Rodtalk 12:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What's with the crop? We barely see the left-side approach to the bridge. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This was taken while hanging off the side of a boat, so I cropped the bit of the boat as it distracted from the bridge (I think).— Rodtalk 15:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ouch. It looks a bit unbalanced without the lead-in. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This sounds like a case where cloning out the boat would be permissible, since it's not even a permanent structure. Samsara (FA • FP) 10:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the suggestion but I'm not really sure what cloning out the boat means. File:Eckington Bridge from the north east 4.jpg shows the left hand end from the other side of the river (or the video File:Eckington Bridge.webm) all of which I took on the same day.— Rodtalk 19:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The nominated image definitely has the better lighting/contrast/exposure. Without having seen the uncropped image, it's not possible to know whether the boat can be gainfully removed, or obscures crucial parts of the scene. Can you upload the uncropped image? I'm sure someone will take a look to see what can be done with it. Samsara (FA • FP) 22:25, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The uncropped image is at File:Eckington Bridge uncropped.JPG which does show more of the left hand approach to the bridge.— Rodtalk 06:58, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see if I can do something with that. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Short of cloning out the wall, can't get in there. Sorry. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]