Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2015 at 20:21:57 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 20:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Stunning. APK whisper in my ear 21:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - hey - finally. Hafspajen (talk) 21:23, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fabelhaft! — Support ~~in principle~~. Alas, I'm wondering just a tiny bit about the lower portion of the central tower: It's so brightly lit that at this resolution it looks ein kleines Bißchen overexposed. Sca (talk) 21:36, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not normally a fan of night pictures due to loss of details, but in this case wow! You couldn't get any more detail if you tried... I agree to an extent about the potential over-exposed elements but I still feel there is enough detail in these sections to still support... Just curious Hafspajen - finally what? What am I missing here? gazhiley 13:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Wave!!! Hurray! _{(Oh just added this one some time ago...)}Hafspajen (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per my vote at the Commons FPC. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Very nice.-Jobas (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PS: It looked a bit different after bombing in WWII (right). Sca (talk) 18:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

_{Comment Weird that the guys still stand after all bombing... . Hafspajen (talk) 05:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

^{Well, there was another year and a half of bombing after this pic. Sca (talk) 23:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)}[reply]

Promoted File:Schloss Charlottenburg nachts (Zuschnitt).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:22, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]