The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: Open 45 days, no change in last month, significant problems not addressed. DelistWoody (talk) 23:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This list, when given a minimal comparison with our two other comparable featured or formerly so lists (Kingdom Hearts and Final Fantasy), has several issues:
Wildly different formatting between sections prevents the list fromhaving any sort of uniting aspect.
Lots of information that should have been somewhere else:
The whole "Anime distribution" section has nothing to do here
The entire "anime" section should be properly a separate list of episodes with summary here.
Unnecessary details about in "DVD releases" and "Video games" (why doN,t these have theirown article anyway)
Poor formatting and formulation choices across the board (what is going on under "Other anime"? Who started the paragraphs with a parenthesis???)
Short summaries to bind novel and manga versions to their episode equivalents should be present.
Throwing the "audio" section all the way down and to group stuff from different source material (series and game) under it is a very poor layouting choice that put a very big separation between audio and visual material from the anime.
I will take a look at the article's formatting over the weekend... I have an idea that may greatly improve the layout and content issues (I have halfway drafted this article in the intended layout (Except for the Manga Volumes section)). G.A.S 16:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Part of the format change is likely because ((Japanese episode list)) had some slight formatting changes after this list was featured. I'll also see what I can do to help if I find time. -- Ned Scott 07:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sortof FLRC commentary
Anybody watching this? The list has not seen edits in over a month. Move to close this unless anyone has any objections. Woody (talk) 18:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I would definitely agree. I'd close it myself,but that would be a sort of COI. Circeus (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]