The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was kept by User:Marskell 09:57, 30 September 2008 [1].

---

Silent Hill 4: The Room[edit]

4. the Article is very short don't have Template:VG Review.don't have system requirement for PC don't have information of engine,series mode and input on Infobox 3.have few images and images are small and on left 2(c).don't have a section for Awards and a section for Guns (see:Assassin's Creed)Amir (talk) 14:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notifications were not done. Anyone home? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These all seem pretty trivial, if a bit confusing due to poor grammar:

1. The article may be short, but it was determined to be comprehensive.
2. There is no rule saying that Template:VG Reviews is needed in every video game article. Same with the infobox notes.
3. Unlike the article you seem to be comparing this one too (Assassin's Creed), SH4 is limited in the images it can use because Konami doesn't offer any free licensing of images.
4. Images are simply arranged how they best fit.
5. There were no awards given to speak of.
6. And a section describing the weapons would be crufty.

Recommend closing this shortly unless any other serious complaints can come. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 14:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

but don't have information about system requirements and I mean of assassin's creed for section of weapon and awrad but the article must have a table or a template for reviews don't have information about engine and series Amir (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no requirement for a review table or game requirements for PC systems. Video game articles to be comprehensive do need a reception section which this article has, but no review table is required (nor possible for all games). Images should be kept to a minimum and small per MOS guidelines I agree with L&M above that the points brought by Amir are not issues with FA quality or VG comprehensiveness. --MASEM 15:22, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Masem's right, there is no problem with not having a table for reviews. I'm not seeing any problems here that merit a FAR. Pagrashtak 04:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK.a featured article about a game don't need information about physics,graphics,system requirements,engine and... I'm sorry for this wiki Amir (talk) 23:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Recommend closing—No significant actionable problems have been identified. The problems raised are either not actual problems (too few images, when non-free images are kept to a minimum; article is "short" when it is comprehensive; need for a game-guide style gun section; use of VG review), or are so minor they don't warrant a FAR (infobox parameters). This has been sitting a couple of days in this state with no further input. Pagrashtak 14:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Recuse, I promoted it, I corrected some WP:ACCESSIBILITY issues, but see nothing else obvious. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No other comments forthcoming. Shutting down. Marskell (talk) 09:33, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.