The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 15:19, 25 January 2007.

---

Battle of Leyte Gulf[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

Messages left at Gdr, Raul654, MilHist and Japan. Sandy (Talk) 22:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An older FA, has no inline citations and has a cleanup tag on top, needs alot of work Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Needs inline citations. LuciferMorgan 13:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Expand the lead section, and adjust it to a more encyclopedic tone. Incline citation is a must! AQu01rius (User • Talk) 05:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to FARC. Mostly uncited, cleanup tag, and citation needed tags. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to FARC. Per reasons given by SandyGeorgia. Buckshot06 21:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Suggested FA criteria concern is lack of citations (1c) and general clean-up (2). Marskell 21:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove Needs in-line citations.UberCryxic 23:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove per my nomination Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove. Per Jaranda.--Yannismarou 21:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove per above. LuciferMorgan 02:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.