The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 16:18, 9 February 2008.


Ralph Bakshi[edit]

previous FAC
previous FAC (02:20, 1 February 2008)
Check external links

I am renominating this article once more that this article was not given enough notice to the point where it would have a serious chance at FA status. The two reviewers that opposed the previous FAC commented on flaws that had, in fact, been addressed by the time the article was nominated, and the FAC ended sooner than it should have. I really feel that this should be a FA. It is well referenced, citing valid printed and online sources, it is well written, and there are no significant problems for it to not be featured at this time. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 04:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

This article does need work but it should stay here for a while longer as it would be a nice addition to Wikipedia's featured content.-BillDeanCarter (talk) 23:01, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that Ibaranoff could do two things: (a) get a hold of all possible sources and provide a competing biography of Bakshi to the upcoming biography or (b) wait until the upcoming biography is published, digest it, rewrite the Wikipedia article, and then a month or two later come here to FAC. I can't see (a) happening just because either you don't have all possible sources or the sources don't provide enough info. So do (b) and you'll have something excellent that will help promote the upcoming book on Bakshi.-BillDeanCarter (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.