The article was not promoted by User:Maralia 13:48, 4 November 2008 [1].
Self Nomination: London's back again! The last FAC failed with sourcing issues, that of which I have now fixed. I put it through another peer review, and now hope it meets the FAC criteria. I will of course be happy to make any changes to it if you don't think it meets the criteria! The Helpful One Review 16:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - there are issues to address.
Questions about some of these sources were raised at the last FAC, and don't seem addressed yet. I have not been through the rest of the article with detailed checking of sources, but again it appears that a lot of web-based sources are being used, when surely a huge amount has been written about London in more reputable or scholarly sources. I would like to see better sources for this important topic. --Aude (talk) 03:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - because a number of the sourcing issues from before still remain, as well as a few new ones.
Removed The Helpful One Review 19:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Removed The Helpful One Review 19:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]