The article was promoted 04:34, 30 March 2007.
This article has undergone a significant improvement drive recently and has been improved in a number of areas. Several images have been added, all claims have citations, the recentism that afflicts most football club articles has been eradicated and all-in-all I think we have a very good shout for elevation to featured status. The Rambling Man 19:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All of Michaelas10's comments have been actioned or rebutted at the article talk page, with one exception to-date:
I have no experience of fair-use rationale and would welcome assistance. --Dweller 14:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Brilliant. All done for this set of comments then. Thank you Michaelas10 - the article's considerably improved as a result. --Dweller 14:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is also no piont giving the same information twice. Remove it from the lead if it's mentioned later then. Buc 12:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - 1a. The prose needs cleaning up throughout. Here are random examples:
Please don't just fix these examples. Tony 08:53, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - very good article, matches the criteria. Bigmike 19:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]