The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 00:03, 20 August 2008 [1].

---

Insane Clown Posse[edit]

Nominator(s): Ibaranoff24

previous FAC (08:03, 9 August 2008)

Much work had been done during the previous nomination, and it was just beginning to gain support, but it was not promoted. A few minor changes have been made since, and I don't think there's much more that needs to be done. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 03:31, 14 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

• Support Per my vote at the last FAC, which fell mainly due to ce and MOS concerns. It is much improved since on that side, and remains strong on content. Ceoil ^sláinte 18:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Support: Well Done. Kensplanet (talk) 20:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Images and sources were reviewed in an earlier FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Support pretty good now jimfbleak (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Looking much better now. I'll just give a couple brief notes. Great job overall.

• World Wrestling Federation involvement: "They were also informed that their commercial would air the very next week, which had still not aired after three months of being involved with the WWF." The order could be improved. Try "They were also informed that their commercial, which had still not aired after three months of being involved with the WWE, would air the next week." Very is unneeded here.
• The Amazing Jeckel Brothers: Is the logical punctuation correct in two instances by ODB's appearance? Got to keep this clean for the kids. :-) Also check "The Lotus Pod." later. Giants2008 (17-14) 19:42, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Is ICP a "they" or an "it"? Zagalejo^^^ 08:27, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • "It" refers to the group as a whole. "They" refers to the individual members. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 04:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]
    • Hmmm.. That's kind of a hazy distinction, no? Zagalejo^^^ 05:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • The copyeditors have made many different changes to the writing style over the course of two FACs and a peer review. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 05:48, 19 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.