The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 04:18, 14 February 2015 (UTC) [1].[reply]
This article is about a rarely studied genus of lemur. Information about them is patchy, dated, and sometimes inconsistent. I have completely re-written the article, added images and illustrations, and successfully run it through GAN. I now feel it's ready for FAC. Unless I've missed something, the article should cover everything known about these lemurs. Please note, however, that there is a discrepancy between this article and some of the source regarding the breeding information. Sources published in 1999 or earlier tend to state widely different birthing dates and infant handling because they were based on the account of a single local "informant". This information was inconsistent with what is known about cheirogaleid breeding, and the more recent material cited should be more accurate. Otherwise, the article should be comprehensive. – Maky « talk » 03:27, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
otherwise looking fine. hence support Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:33, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I'm a co-author on one of the cited references (Dunkel et al. 2012).
Ucucha (talk) 07:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A comprehensive and well-written overview of the subject. Ucucha (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Spot check: I checked refs 1 a–j, 43, 46–48, 50–52 and 54–56. All absolutely fine. If I'm being hyperpicky I could have done with actual pages for refs 1 a-j. True the page range is only three pages, but it's pretty dense stuff and the ten statements took a bit of tracking down. Still, this affects only the spot-checker; the general reader won't mind a bit. The article passes the spot check with flying colours. – Tim riley talk 14:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]