The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 02:18, 9 September 2007.

Age of Enlightenment[edit]

I feel this article is very comprehensive in nature and provides a great deal of detail into the subject of philosophy, and specifically the Enlightenment era. Page is well edited, neat, and objective. MrRobinzine 20:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy oppose: No citations. Alientraveller 20:19, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: per above. DSachan 20:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: minimal citations; half the article is a list. — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:06, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Lacking citations per WP:V and WP:CITE; lists are an ineffective method of describing an entire era to readers unfamiliar with that era. Awadewit | talk 00:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: As above. - Hairchrm 04:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose: so many issues – substantial part is a list, no in-line citation, ^{[citation needed]}, etc. MarkBA ^t/c/@ 14:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose:The copy editing is not very good. 3 sentences or less per paragraph is what I recommend. Laleena 01:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Citations needed. Also, a section dedicated to the philosophies of the Age of Enlightment would come in real handy.Kmarinas86 04:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.