It's an excellent article! User:Barbagianni Potente
- Support Barbagianni Potente, 8.40, 28 september 2006 (UTC)
- Refer to Peer Review This is not an excellent article at all. There are barely any citations and the article is filled with stubs and lists.UberCryxic 13:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Object Definatly not a featured article. UberCryxic was right when he/she said there were no citations and also when he/she said there were lots of stubs and lists. Daniel10 18:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Object Definatly NON neutral article and without information about match-fixing scandal of 1980 (Colombo) and 1982 (Farina), similar a Calciopoli. --Dantemateo 20:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Object per the others. However, I do want to say the article is pretty good: with thorough, in-line citations, I would reconsider. Surely there has been a lot of material written about this subject? It shouldn't be too hard to find sources concerning the history of the club. Mangojuicetalk 15:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Object There are no in-line citations and certain sections should be expanded. -- Underneath-it-All 15:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Object for many reasons, but the following are the most pertinent:
- No inline citations, which are especially necessary for where the article discusses controversies.
- The history section is unbalanced and concentrates on the present too much; it is also split into too many small subsections.
- The reserve/youth squads are not notable enough for inclusion, as are details of the therapists/masseurs.
- No criteria given for what makes a former players or coaches "notable" or worthy of inclusion in the list.
- The current UEFA Club ranking is not really relevant to the article. Qwghlm 21:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]