Prithviraj Productions – Close overturned and AfD relisted. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 04:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Prithviraj Productions (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (article`\|`XfD`\|`restore) While the subject may or may not be notable, the AFD had problems when looked retrospectively. The nominator is a CU confirmed sockpuppet, although not blocked at the time. Out of two delete and two keep votes, a keep vote was stricken off as a sockpuppet. Applying the same logic, the nomination itself could be nullified, not to mention the bludgeoning and personal attack. Additionally, the IP edit could potentially be the nominator editing while logged out. I would recommend reverting the deletion and instead tagging the article with Template:Notability or considering a draftification process. Gan Favourite (talk) 15:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] Relist There are dozens of results about the subject on Wikipedia alone.[1] Relisting should happen again. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 00:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] Overturn and Relist - This AFD was corrupted by sockpuppetry, so that DRVPURPOSE 5, a serious procedural error through no fault of the closer (because the error was that of the sockmaster). Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] Relist due to tainted closure. No fault whatsoever should be ascribed to the closer who should not be expected to perform a deep-dive investigation for sock-puppetry. Stifle (talk) 10:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] Relist. No closer error, but this AFD is tainted by socks. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 12:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply] Relist The discussion should be unbiased and we should have more opinions to understand the notability of the page.Jimandjam (talk) 10:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Prithviraj Productions – Close overturned and AfD relisted. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 04:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

While the subject may or may not be notable, the AFD had problems when looked retrospectively. The nominator is a CU confirmed sockpuppet, although not blocked at the time. Out of two delete and two keep votes, a keep vote was stricken off as a sockpuppet. Applying the same logic, the nomination itself could be nullified, not to mention the bludgeoning and personal attack. Additionally, the IP edit could potentially be the nominator editing while logged out. I would recommend reverting the deletion and instead tagging the article with Template:Notability or considering a draftification process. Gan Favourite (talk) 15:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relist There are dozens of results about the subject on Wikipedia alone.[1] Relisting should happen again. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 00:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overturn and Relist - This AFD was corrupted by sockpuppetry, so that DRVPURPOSE 5, a serious procedural error through no fault of the closer (because the error was that of the sockmaster). Robert McClenon (talk) 03:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relist due to tainted closure. No fault whatsoever should be ascribed to the closer who should not be expected to perform a deep-dive investigation for sock-puppetry. Stifle (talk) 10:28, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relist. No closer error, but this AFD is tainted by socks. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} (please mention me on reply) 12:47, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relist The discussion should be unbiased and we should have more opinions to understand the notability of the page.Jimandjam (talk) 10:36, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.