Sangeeta Bhabra (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

Significant new information. Page to be considered for restore is Talk:Sangeeta Bhabra/Sangeeta Bhabra (placed there for development of the redirect) but while I would be happy to place it in position technically I can't so options are DRV or WP:RM. Original XfD was a minimal participation non-admin redirect !supervote though article was not fit for mainspace. In retrospect I could have developed the redirect in situ but unless I achieved a reasonable result quickly that would be a bad choice and I have RL commitments which can come up suddenly at present and means I must drop stuff. Subject has been prominently in position for over 10 years now and very prominent during lockdown as first solo anchor of weekday program; a very different state from the XfD of over 10 years ago. Djm-leighpark (talk) 04:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• A 10-year-old AfD shouldn't prevent an article from being created. That said, the sources in the article are really local and it's not clear that the topic would live through AfD if those are the best sources that exist. Formally, allow recreation without prejudice to a new AfD or, less formally, just withdraw this DRV before anyone else gets involved, create the article, and see what happens. Hobit (talk) 07:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Hobit I technically (now) cannot do that move (Well I tried and failed). People are continually saying how women are under represented. I'd agree AfD is better place to discuss details than DRV and with time pressure RL (and WP) this needs other input. I'm happy for route you suggest if someone is prepared to do the technicals. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:12, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• If someone agrees it is reasonable for me to do a CSD G7 on Sangeeta Bhabra then I could move it into position and remove this AfD. I do want to be open about what I am doing and not slide a backdoor. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Update: Rethink: I've boldly requested a CSD G7 and if that succeeds I'll move the updated article in and if that all succeeds I'll withdraw the DRV (no prejudice to anyone doing a BEFORE and then raising a AfD if they are so inclined. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 10:30, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdraw: as nominator per Hobit's suggestion and as article now in place at Sangeeta Bhabra. Can I kindly ask an admin to perform the closure for me. As a technical note Talk:Sangeeta Bhabra was unfortunately G8 deleted in the page shuffling (I have a request for restore at WP:REFUND and can I ask that version is restored rather than a new one deleted. (has been restored so talk page in place) Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Realme (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

Needs to restore some content that isn't considered promotion

Also, redraft if necessary. Arianator with love (talk) 15:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Endorse deletion: Given theCSD G11 and the need to have the target salted due to repeated attempts to recreate and the apparent failure to attempt to even try to negotiate a draftification with the closing admin and failure of DRV nomination to appreciate this it seems unlikely the nom. would make appropriate use of any draftification. This nomination probably fails WP:DRVPURPOSE criteria and may be inelligible to be discussed here. 20:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djm-leighpark (talk • contribs)

In the light of comments below and actually having seen the article the subject is probably viable and I may have cause to AGF the nom. has the intention to try to (re)create a viable draft. Assuming the key claims are somewhat near correct the organisation is a substantial mobile/cell phone producer to the public and therefore a significant visibility. If I was attempting to get this into mainspace myself I would probably try to chop everything that could viably be chopped and try to concentrate on key facts. I note one person's product feature is another's advertisement. Although the article is about organisation it is product/brand that is likely notable. A question to nom. Arianator with love though, as you have a draft are you prepared to withdraw nomination? Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:37, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Now at Draft:Realme. I think this is still a G11 even in draftspace, though I haven't looked at any revisions except the first and last to see if there's anything to revert to. @DGG: was this deleted anywhere else? I only see the one speedy at Realme preceding your salting as "repeatedly recreated". —Cryptic 21:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

to be honest, I have lost track of the previous creations and moves. There seem to have been several people doing things at the same time. Based on the current draft,I would say there might be potential for an article, but not in its curent form. DGG ( talk ) 21:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Question - What does the appellant want? There is a draft. Do they want a trout? Robert McClenon (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]