Eugenia Cooney (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

The deletion was justified at the time. However, this girl has received a flurry of coverage in the media since her return to Youtube. That combined with the controversy surrounding her return, makes her notable in my opinion. More specifically, WP:BLP1E no longer applies. Here are a few articles on her on the first page of Google search results alone [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 17:18, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Userify the deleted content to Eventhorizon51 so it could be worked on with new sources, and I think there should be no issues with that. But...why haven't you talked with the closer before coming here? This seems like a situation that could have been easily resolved. The last AfD (properly closed, but this deletion review isn't about it) was 20 months ago, there is new coverage of the subject as demonstrated. If someone would still have any issues, the article can easily be renominated for another discussion. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• userify/restore as draft In theory could be sent back to AfD, but there are clearly enough new sources to overcome a speedy. Seems reasonable to restore the old article as a starting point. Hobit (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Schneider (writer) (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

I can't edit this page, so I'm bringing the discussion here. I'm bringing Schneider's notability into question. Zelda120! (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Wrong venue this is the place to assess whether or not a previous deletion discussion (AFD, Speedy deletion ect) was closed correctly not a place to advocate for deletion that is the job of WP:AFD. Granted there was a previous deletion discussion in March 2007 but that is far too old to contest now. Barring a speedy deletion criteria applying a second AFD needs to be opened.--67.68.29.90 (talk) 04:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Zelda posted an AfD template at the article page, but didn't create the AfD page or otherwise follow the steps at WP:AFD for new nominations, and instead filed here. Zelda, please see the procedure for nominating an article for AFD at WP:AFD sections WP:BEFORE and WP:AFDHOWTO. I removed the AfD template from the article page. Perhaps this thread should be withdrawn or procedurally closed. BTW, note the article has been nominated three times already, the last two were keeps. [6] [7] [8]. – Levivich 05:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]