Deletion review archives: 2017 January

7 January 2017

  • Kingsley C. Dassanayake – Summarily reopened and relisted. An administrator having indicated, by relisting the discussion, that they found the consensus unclear, an NAC is plainly inappropriate in the complete absence of further comments. – T. Canens (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Kingsley C. Dassanayake (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

Based on the votes this Afd was heading for keep but the reasons given by AKS.9955: for his WP:NAC are contrary to the points made by the contributors. None of those who voted keep argued that the subject met WP:BASIC and WP:GNG and yet this was the reason he gave for keeping the article. AKS.9955 has a history of making problematic non-admin Afd closures (e.g. Leslie R. Mitchell) and is the subject of an ANI discussion. obi2canibetalk contr 16:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.