Template:Trout – Maybe I was just overreacting C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 21:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Template:Trout (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (XfD`\|`restore) This did not fit under WP:SNOW, because there was one delete vote. It was not unanimous and should not have been treated as such. For that reason, I think it should be relisted. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 20:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] Closing admin's comment WP:SNOW closes do not need to be unanimous. Speedy closes do (per SK1), but snowball clause closes do not. In this case, despite the presence of a delete !vote, it was clear that there was not a snowball's chance in hell of the template being deleted, and the nominator explicitly stated, multiple times, that he had only nominated the template for deletion as retaliation for it having been used on his talk page, including the comment "you're just asking for trouble" when it was used in the TfD itself [1]. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply] Keep template, I don't mean to ask for trouble, so this time I'll just do this - ((trout)) for blatantly misunderstanding the entire concept of snow close. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 21:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Template:Trout – Maybe I was just overreacting C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 21:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

This did not fit under WP:SNOW, because there was one delete vote. It was not unanimous and should not have been treated as such. For that reason, I think it should be relisted. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 20:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Closing admin's comment WP:SNOW closes do not need to be unanimous. Speedy closes do (per SK1), but snowball clause closes do not. In this case, despite the presence of a delete !vote, it was clear that there was not a snowball's chance in hell of the template being deleted, and the nominator explicitly stated, multiple times, that he had only nominated the template for deletion as retaliation for it having been used on his talk page, including the comment "you're just asking for trouble" when it was used in the TfD itself [1]. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep template, I don't mean to ask for trouble, so this time I'll just do this - ((trout)) for blatantly misunderstanding the entire concept of snow close. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 21:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.