Hugh Howitt – listed at AfD. Nothing more to do here. – JohnCD (talk) 21:28, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.
Hugh Howitt (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (XfD`\|`restore) I listed this article for speedy deletion as the subject of the article Hugh aka 'Hamish' Howitt is not a significant or important figure and does not warrant a WP article. I live in Blackpool and he is simply a local pub landlord who launched a silly and pointless campaign against the introduction of the smoking ban. I have attempted twice to have this article deleted but a user Phillip Bridger contests it everytime claiming the references prove the significance. He has not justified his contests on the article talk page he simply just removes them. I feel this article should be deleted and I would appreciate an independent opinion, thank you. Christian1985 (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] Not a DRV issue if Prod's are contested or no CSDs apply, list it for a deletion dicussion at afd --82.7.44.178 (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] I've nominated this at AfD on Christian1985's behalf here, and I now suggest that this be speedily closed.—S Marshall T/C 21:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Hugh Howitt – listed at AfD. Nothing more to do here. – JohnCD (talk) 21:28, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

I listed this article for speedy deletion as the subject of the article Hugh aka 'Hamish' Howitt is not a significant or important figure and does not warrant a WP article. I live in Blackpool and he is simply a local pub landlord who launched a silly and pointless campaign against the introduction of the smoking ban. I have attempted twice to have this article deleted but a user Phillip Bridger contests it everytime claiming the references prove the significance. He has not justified his contests on the article talk page he simply just removes them. I feel this article should be deleted and I would appreciate an independent opinion, thank you. Christian1985 (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a DRV issue if Prod's are contested or no CSDs apply, list it for a deletion dicussion at afd --82.7.44.178 (talk) 21:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated this at AfD on Christian1985's behalf here, and I now suggest that this be speedily closed.—S Marshall T/C 21:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.