Themis_music – Deletion endorsed – Eluchil404 (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Themis_music (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (restore) Now Notable - page needs my rewrite —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie alsop (talk • contribs) Malformed DRV fixed & redundant link removed. Since nom seems to be requesting unsalting, I'll note that the easiest way to persuade DRV is by presenting a well-sourced userspace draft. Tim Song (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] My standard suggestion in the case that a page has been deleted enough times that an admin has felt it appropriate to protect from recreation is to present a sourced userspace draft. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] Keep deleted The deletion debate was closed according to consensus. The "delete" votes were much stronger than the "keep" votes. Katie alsop (talk · contribs) has not provided any additional information that would prove that this topic is notable. If a sourced userspace draft can be provided at a future DRV, I would not object to recreation. Cunard (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Themis_music – Deletion endorsed – Eluchil404 (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Now Notable - page needs my rewrite —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie alsop (talk • contribs)

Malformed DRV fixed & redundant link removed. Since nom seems to be requesting unsalting, I'll note that the easiest way to persuade DRV is by presenting a well-sourced userspace draft. Tim Song (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My standard suggestion in the case that a page has been deleted enough times that an admin has felt it appropriate to protect from recreation is to present a sourced userspace draft. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleted The deletion debate was closed according to consensus. The "delete" votes were much stronger than the "keep" votes. Katie alsop (talk · contribs) has not provided any additional information that would prove that this topic is notable. If a sourced userspace draft can be provided at a future DRV, I would not object to recreation. Cunard (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Wicca_music – Deletion endorsed – Eluchil404 (talk) 02:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.
Wicca_music (talk`\|`edit`\|`history`\|`logs`\|`links`\|`watch) (XfD`\|`restore) Now Notable - page needs my rewrite —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie alsop (talk • contribs) Malformed DRV fixed & redundant, malformed link removed. Since nom seems to be requesting unsalting, I'll note that the easiest way to persuade DRV is by presenting a well-sourced userspace draft. Tim Song (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] My standard suggestion in the case that a page has been deleted enough times that an admin has felt it appropriate to protect from recreation is to present a sourced userspace draft. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] Keep deleted The deletion debate was closed according to consensus. The "delete" votes were much stronger than the "keep" votes. Katie alsop (talk · contribs) has not provided any additional information that would prove that this topic is notable. If a sourced userspace draft can be provided at a future DRV, I would not object to recreation. Cunard (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

Wicca_music – Deletion endorsed – Eluchil404 (talk) 02:07, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it.

Now Notable - page needs my rewrite —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie alsop (talk • contribs)

Malformed DRV fixed & redundant, malformed link removed. Since nom seems to be requesting unsalting, I'll note that the easiest way to persuade DRV is by presenting a well-sourced userspace draft. Tim Song (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My standard suggestion in the case that a page has been deleted enough times that an admin has felt it appropriate to protect from recreation is to present a sourced userspace draft. Stifle (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep deleted The deletion debate was closed according to consensus. The "delete" votes were much stronger than the "keep" votes. Katie alsop (talk · contribs) has not provided any additional information that would prove that this topic is notable. If a sourced userspace draft can be provided at a future DRV, I would not object to recreation. Cunard (talk) 19:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.