The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
I wish to undelete ((support)), ((oppose)), and ((neutralvote)) as they are quite useful in places other than major voting places (which include WP:RFA). I know that I might start another controversy, but I feel that they are important vote templates that could be used elsewhere. MathCool10 Sign here! 03:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
I would like to request a full review of the most recent closure of the Soggy biscuit deletion discussion as I feel there was a strong consensus to delete the article. (This is not a vote, people.) JBsupreme (talk) 07:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
History undeletion. It is currently a redirect and will not likely be restored anytime soon, but it would be nice to see the old version of this article. If there was a Google platform article during the AfD it could very well have been redirected instead of deleted. ~ PaulT+/C 20:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Livecare Support (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) User:Alfax/Livecare Support (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) (restore | cache | MfD)) rewritten Alfax (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC) I write to ask to consider the re-written article User:Alfax/Livecare Support. Talking with DS and MZMcBride I tried to explain my point of view. RHaworth told me to write this request. The article was removed because it was badly written. In Wikipedia the article Comparison of remote desktop software compares different products and technologies related on Remote Desktop services. Livecare Support is a product for Remote Desktop Software and I would like to put it in that list. I started modifying the article of a competitor; so it's basically the same structure, and the main reason of the article is to describe the differences from Livecare Support and the other softwares. Please consider my point of view regarding the article: Since Wikipedia is NOT a business directory we've to consider the article Comparison of remote desktop software. If this article is published, I think that Livecare Support has to be published, to complete the list of the softwares. If Livecare Support can't be published, I think it's better to remove Comparison of remote desktop software and all the products detail are reported. If Livecare Support is NOT published, it will be punished, and I don't understand the reason. If the article is published it's NOT AN ADVERTISEMENT because the Comparison of remote desktop software consider ALL the softwares and not one in particular. My article is not written in "advertisement-like" style. I hope you consider it, as neutral as I tried to write it. If there is anything you want to modify, please let me know. Thanks. Alfax (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Maatkit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) Valuable software, has many users Windpaw (talk) 02:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |