|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
List of digital television stations in Canada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) Was deleted with the reason "not a helpful presentation of this information; digital channel numbers should be integrated directly into provincial lists, not a special list to themselves", with no evidence of discussion, consensus, and I am not sure that's a candidate for speedy deletion either. ViperSnake151 22:31, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Natalie Portman's Shaved Head (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) Also natalie portman's shaved head; both titles were protected after multiple A7's (the silly name probably didn't help). Requesting unsalting based upon the metric tons of press the band has gotten - e.g.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7], etc; there's more in Google News. Chubbles (talk) 15:09, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
====
List of iconic smokers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) AFD was No Consensus admin did not have authority to delete 204.52.215.93 (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Emergenetics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) According to the Afd guidelines, the discussion should be done to form a concensus. With 5 keeps and 6 deletes, it's clear that there was no consensus, yet the page was deleted. Ordinarily, I wouldn't even necessarily object to that, but I believe in the case of a lack of concensus, the admin doing the delete should explain the reasoning. In this case, all that was given was "The result was delete". It's clear that I was on the "Keep" side after doing a fair bit of reading on the subject, so I ask that someone completely uninvolved with the situation take an unbiased look. Kickstart70TC 03:09, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Bruno Masse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) I contest the notion that this discussion shows consensus to delete the article, and propose that the close be overturned. Closer Seraphimblade (talk · contribs · count) stands by their decision, on the grounds that the delete proponents (nominator + weak delete from DGG (talk · contribs)) had the superior argument. So this DRV is a test of the competing principles of closer as consensus-assessor and closer-as-judge. the skomorokh 02:48, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
So Good (TVB) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (restore | cache | AfD)) After an administrator deleted an article believing that it is a website when it is a cooking show broadcasted on a national channel, I asked him to explain but he ignored me. I feel that that speedy deletion is completely misguided as I had limited knowledge about that program at the time, and that link will prove that the show does exist as well as this, plus somebody told me that there is a Chinese Wiki article about that show Banana Jim (talk) 16:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
|
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it. |