|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Article for a massively popular song/video/meme on YouTube. It was first deleted at AfD due to a lack of reliable sources. That was perfectly fine, because there were none. It was then recreated many times and speedy-deleted by Starblind and other administrators. These speedy deletions were mostly of the exact same content and rightly deleted as CSD G4 (repost). A newer version was posted, and again speedily deleted, a decision that was upheld on DRV (which I closed), once again citing a lack of reliable sources. In the two weeks following the DRV, quite a number of reliable sources have come out on the topic of the song. I decided to write an entirely new and well referenced draft in my userspace that I felt met the criteria for WP:MUSIC and/or WP:WEB. I inquired on WP:AN if anyone obejected to my unprotection of the article and creation of a new version of the article. I waited 7 hours and there were no objections, so I was bold and moved the article into the mainspace. This was deleted within minutes by Starblind as CSD G4 and re-salted by Deskana. This is despite the fact that CSD G4 applies only to instances where "the copy is substantially identical to the deleted version and that any changes to it do not address the reasons for which it was deleted". I also feel as though my draft passes notability criteria with multiple, non-trivial, and reliable sources as well as covers by notable musicians. Most of the references I cited in the new draft were not available during the last DRV. Consensus and notability may change, and new reliable sources may emerge. I am asking for an overturn and allow recreation of this article (per the draft that myself and Wikidemo have worked on). IronGargoyle 22:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
I believe most voters underestimated the hysterical interest in detailed charts and lists related to Barry Bonds' home run accomplishment. Two detailed charts have been added in the Accomplishments section since he tied and broke the record. I have userfied the list at User:TonyTheTiger/Barry Bonds home run watch. I could use some eyes to clean up my list, but will probably miss the mania even if this DRV is successful. TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
|
---|
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
Has made 16 appearances in the Football League [1], therefore passes WP:BIO. ArtVandelay13 12:02, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This pornstar was nominated for three 2007 AVN Awards [2] and therefore passes WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 10:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC) |
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |
This was prodded for no claim of notability and having no sources, and deleted as "blatant advertising". I'm not so sure the artilce was advertising, and it certainly wasn't blatant. Even if it was, an ((advert)) tag would've been more appropriate. This gives the chance of improving the article about this notable and popular software. Having no references is not a reason to delete an article (how I wish it was!); for improving these problems, ((unreferenced)) or ((primarysources)) should've been used. Mikeblas 01:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
|
The above is an archived debate of the deletion review of the article above. Please do not modify it. |