29 August 2012

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-08-29 Edit

2012-08-29 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
Attribution added. Hut 8.5 15:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Entire text of the (copyrighted) statement in question, too long to be justified as fair use. Removed. Hut 8.5 15:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. Hut 8.5 15:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 August 29 since author claims permission on talk page. Hut 8.5 16:43, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Permission plausible Article blanked and contributor notified how to proceed. An administrator should delete if permission is not verified within five to seven days of the timestamp. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Email sent to OTRS according to talk page. Hut 8.5 15:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Could be restored if usable permission is verified and it's not deleted at AfD. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:01, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Hut 8.5 15:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Infringing page has been deleted, recreation is OK after cleanup. Hut 8.5 15:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Single author c&p move. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. Left note for tagger, not a clear copyvio from source--pointed them towards F9 deletion or FFD as appropriate. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Thank you. :)Maryland is not among the few states that release their content into the public domain. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:43, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:11, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:12, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:24, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
More