< September 14 September 16 >

September 15

Category:Fictional deities by gender

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only two subcategories. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. No plausible room for expansion beyond the gender binary. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Russian and Soviet theatre directors

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Russian and Soviet theatre directors

Category:Female–female vocal duets

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Female–female vocal duets

Category:Works based on real people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:38, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Option A: rename to Category:Works about real people
Option B: rename to Category:Works based on people
Two alternative suggestions by User:Peterkingiron and User:jc37 in this earlier discussion. This is a procedural nomination, I do not have an opinion about it myself. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Option A was proposed by User:Johnbod at first. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 15:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Option A, or C, but preference for A as novels etc are all about "people", just not real ones (normally) so "real" seems useful. Johnbod (talk) 02:06, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:45, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Fayenatic London 15:19, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Kingdom of England emigrants

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Kingdom of England emigrants

Category:1945 establishments in East Germany

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. These categories have very recently been nominated. There is nothing to suggest a new discussion is necessary. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:42, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete as these shouldn't have been created in the first place. Santiago Claudio (talk) 09:32, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Santiago Claudio: redirects are often wrong, these pages merely exist to point Wikipedia users in the right direction. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Like a Dragon (series)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:42, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Propose merging Category:Like a Dragon (series) to Category:Yakuza (series)
Nominator's rationale: The games were manually moved to a new category without consensus and it should all be merged back and this category locked. The main article remains titled Yakuza and the move proposal has failed to garner support. (No objections to the original category being moved to Category:Yakuza (franchise) before they are merged back though). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Foo by country by century

More