November 19
Category:Fictional smokers
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Fictional smokers to Category:Fictional smokers and vapers
- Nominator's rationale: More inclusive. --Wahspsneh (talk) 17:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, not a defining characteristic (but then move subCategory:Tobacco advertising characters directly under Category:Smoking.) Marcocapelle (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Marcocapelle. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, not a defining characteristic. Bearcat (talk) 13:18, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Promising Young Woman
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 27#Category:Promising Young Woman
Disc golf courses
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Alabama
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Arizona
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in California
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Colorado
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Delaware
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Florida
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Georgia
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Idaho
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Indiana
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Kentucky
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Maryland
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Massachusetts
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Michigan
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Minnesota
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Missouri
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Montana
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Nebraska
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Nevada
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in New York
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in North Carolina
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Oklahoma
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Oregon
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Pennsylvania
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in South Dakota
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Tennessee
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Texas
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Vermont
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Virginia
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Washington
- Propose deleting Category:Disc golf courses in Wisconsin
- Nominator's rationale: delete, with very few exceptions there aren't any disc golf courses in the United States that have their own article. The courses just have a brief mention in a park article or a resort article or similar, which in turn have been put in these categories. This is clearly a case of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The exceptions are: DeLaveaga Disc Golf Course and Diamond X, these should be moved to Category:Disc golf courses in the United States. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete -- In most cases disc golf is one feature of a larger visitor attraction, such as a state park, so that this is more like a VENUE categorisation. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:27, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Single-article books categories
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 27#Single-article books categories
Current categories
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 27#Current categories
River Seine
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 November 27#River Seine
Category:Legislation of the War of 1812
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- Propose renaming Category:Legislation of the War of 1812 to Category:War of 1812 legislation
- Nominator's rationale: As a subcategory of Category:Statutory law by topic, renaming will match this category the pattern set by Category: World War I legislation and Category: World War II legislation. The war name is first followed by legislation. Senator2029 【talk】 07:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This could have been listed for speedy renaming. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:00, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support I actually prefer the current name but precedent says otherwise. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support for consistency. — Mugtheboss (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.