< March 16 March 18 >

March 17

Category:Historic public gardens

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Urban public parks. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, there is little difference between public gardens and public parks, as illustrated by the fact that the category contains several parks. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Anglican Liturgical book

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Anglican liturgical books. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename, liturgical does not require capitalization and as it is a set category "books" should be in plural. Thus was opposed for speedy renaming. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
copy of speedy discussion
  • Category:Anglican Liturgical book to Category:Anglican Liturgical book – C2A: I do not see why "liturgical" should take a capital letter; compare with Category:Catholic liturgical books Veverve (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oppose Duh! Should clearly be "books", like the Catholic example given. Arguably not all these books are actually "liturgical" for that matter - the prayer books for example. A better name would be nice. Johnbod (talk) 16:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Veverve and Johnbod: pinging contributors to speedy discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah yes, it should be "books", my bad! Veverve (talk) 23:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Catholic priests convicted of child sexual abuse

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: All the articles seem to be about Roman Catholics. Rathfelder (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • No they aren't, they just always have used a different language and they may have slightly different practices in liturgy. Organizationally, the Catholic Church is divided in 24 particular churches, of which the Latin Church is one, and these have very limited autonomy. Eastern Catholic is a catch-all term for the other 23 but that has nothing to do with organizational structure. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article says "They are distinct theologically, liturgically, and historically from the Latin Church". That does seem relevant to these categories.Rathfelder (talk) 08:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Rathfelder: "Roman Catholic (term)" is synonymous with "Catholic", i.e. both expressions designate at the same time Latin and Eastern Catholics.
    If you want to precise the person's church sui iuris to split the category, you should propose a renaming along the lines of "Catholic priests of the Latin Church convicted of crimes". However, I do not think such a split is necessary between Latin and Eastern priests. Veverve (talk) 09:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Category:Converts to Eastern Catholicism from Roman Catholicism is totally weird, that is not a conversion. This becomes very clear when reading the church career of Manuel Nin who is in this category. The governance of every of the 24 particular churches is distinct (i.e. they have a little bit of autonomy) while there is no common governance for the 23 Eastern Catholic particular churches together. Besides it escapes me why this would be relevant for criminal offenses. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Quotations from law

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Latin legal terminology. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 17:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OVERLAPCAT, nearly all quotations inside are Latin, although there's parent Category:Quotations. Brandmeistertalk 10:26, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Filipino priests

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 3#Category:Filipino priests

Category:Persibom Bolaang Mongondow

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Category:Persibom Bolaang Mongondow

Category:Black-and-white music videos

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not sure why this is necessary or why it is of significance. Should we have categories for music videos that have different coloured filters too etc.? Seems superfluous and fancrufty ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 08:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Marcocapelle (talk) 06:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC) [reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Persibom Bolmong players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Persibom Bolaang Mongondow players. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per Category:Persibom Bolaang Mongondow. OktaRama2010 (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Category was not properly tagged for discussion. I have done so now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:42, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
More